Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low cost passengers'flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that governments should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily. Do you agree or disagree ?

As our civilization grows, humans develop more advanced means of transportation, and the latest transportation means are the ones that involve flying, the machines that take us to the sky:
airplanes
. Since we have reached that point, we have become so fond of flying that we want to make more of it.
Hence
,
air
traffic
is increasing, and coming with it are its problems:
noise
, pollution, and the construction of more and more airports.
This
leads to people thinking that
government
Suggestion
the government
should try to reduce
air
traffic
by taxing it more heavily. It may work, but in my opinion, you cannot solve the problems
air
traffic
causes by restricting it, but you must resolve them directly.
Firstly
, we have to find ways to solve the
noise
problem.
Noise
from aeroplanes is usually caused by their massive size and speed, generated when they tear through the
air
, what’s more, some of the
noise
is caused by their powerful engines. We can solve
this
by developing better plane designs. You may say
this
is impossible as the planes are too big not to make
noise but
Accept comma addition
noise, but
I say we can reduce the
noise
it make to a minimum.
Although
it is not possible for current technology, it may be in the future. One way to develop the technology is by researching the properties of the owls. As we have known, owls are amazing birds of prey which create almost no sound when they fly, their flying is so quiet that birds way smaller than
them
people in general
they
make much more
noise
.
Next
, about pollution. Pollution is one of the most troublesome problems most countries face today, not only because of
air
traffic
, but
also
because of other industries. For
air
traffic
, the pollution often comes from the burning of the fuel.
Airplanes
, like other vehicles, burn petroleum-based fuel to generate energy, and the by-product of the burning contains carbon dioxide, a destructive greenhouse gas. To solve
this
, we have to develop new types of fuels, ones that are eco-friendly.
For example
, we should keep an eye out on the technology that allows safe use of burning hydrogen and oxygen, as the final product of that process is literally water, the liquid that we all love. In a nutshell, I think in order to solve the problems caused by
air
traffic
, you should not restrict the
air
traffic
itself, but try to solve the problems directly
instead
. And the most simple way to solve the problems is relying on science to develop new technologies to better the
air
industry.
Submitted by Andy on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Structure your answers in logical paragraphs

The easiest way to score well on the IELTS Task 2 writing portion is to structure your writing in a solid essay format.

A strong argument essay structure can be split up into 4 paragraphs, each containing 4 sentences (except the conclusion paragraph, which only contains 3 sentences).

Stick to this essay structure:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: