Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

It is believed that it would be better for university students to be forced into certain key areas than being able to the course of their choice. From my perspective, these two notions have

positives but

Accept comma addition

positives, but

the latter is more fundamentally justified, as will be now explained. On the one hand, there are two primary reasons why universities should offer subjects that will be more useful in the future.

First

, individuals may assert that the university course, like technology, engineering or medicine are more likely to be beneficial than art degrees. Society as a whole think that these courses provide more job opportunities, career progression, better salaries,

as

Suggestion

such as improving

such

improving the quality of life for those who take them.

Second

, on the societal level, by forcing students into particular subjects, governments can ensure that any knowledge and skill gaps in the economy could be covered.

Moreover

, focusing on technology in tertiary schooling could lead to new inventions, economic growth and greater future prosperity.

On the other hand

, the importance of being freed to choose their preference must not be underestimated. The logic behind

this

is that society will benefit more if our students are passionate about what they are learning. In doing so, employers begin to value creative thinking skills above practical or technical skills, resulting in higher-quality productivity. Another reason is nobody can predict which areas of knowledge could be most useful for the following decades.

For example

, with the creative and unique idea, those in agriculture domains can design various special irrigation-based practices to better farmer’s harvest increasingly. If

this

were the case, the community would need more students of horticulture, philosophy or art than of science or technology. In conclusion,

although

it might sensible for educational systems to focus on only the most effective subjects, the current system in which people have the right to study whatever they like is more well-preferred.