Many people believe that we should protect all wild animals while others believe we should just protect some of them. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Nowadays, many

species

of animals are getting extinct. It is widely held believe that we must preserve all

organisms but

Accept comma addition

organisms, but

there is a strong counterargument that we should save only

few

Suggestion

a few

of them.

This

essay will discuss both points of view and argue in the favour of

first idea

Suggestion

the first idea

. On one hand, It is believed that all the

species

of animals should be protected.

This

mailny

for the most part

mainly

because it helps to maintain a healthy balance in the

food

chain.

For instance

, some animals can be

food

benefit

good

for others. If one variety of the animals got vanished, there will be no

food

for the other animals which depends on them for feeding.

Therefore

, all the animals play

necessary role

Suggestion

a necessary role

necessary roles

in

food chain

Suggestion

the food chain

.

Hence

, they all should be saved.

On the other hand

, some people think that only some chosen wild organisms should be preserved. One of the main

reason

Suggestion

reasons

why

this

view is held because some

species

of the animals are getting extinct. One day there will be no sign of

such

species

.

For example

,

there

Suggestion

There

are few white tigers left in the world and their population is decreasing day by day.

Therefore

, it is very important to save some of the animals on

priorty

status established in order of importance or urgency

priority

property

basis as

Accept comma addition

basis, as

they are at high of getting endangered. In conclusion, some people support the notion that all the animals should be saved while others think that only

few

Suggestion

a few

of them should be protected. In my opinion, we should protect all the animals without distinction because all of them play a vital part in the

food

system.