In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks?

Electronic video surveillance in public places is rapidly gaining its popularity in the metropolis for the fight against crime.
On the other hand
, there are few instances where
such
systems became the reason for the breach of an individual's privacy.
Although
, I believe that video surveillance is essential to curb the crime whereas there are some drawbacks of
such
amendments as well. To commence with, with the accelerated growth of crime rates in cities. It's practically impossible for the police system to keep a watch on every nook and corner of the town manually. Since
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
majority of
such
instances takes place during the graveyard hours and it is neither feasible nor efficient to perform manual patrolling in all the suspicious areas round the clock.
Hence
,
such
systems are being considered as a substitute these days. In India, these additional measures are helpful in solving cases like chain snatching, vehicle theft and many more and sending the culprits behind the bars. In a recent report published by Delhi Police
Add a comma
,
show examples
there has been a decrease of thirty per cent in chain snatching incidents since the government has installed security cameras locally.
However
,
such
techniques have been used as a tool for privacy breach on an individual level.
furthermore
, the manual tracking of the recorded videos leaves individual freedom at stake. Recently, Kolkata police registered a case in which one traffic constable was found guilty of stalking a girl using the recording of the security camera installed outside the girl's house. To conclude, installation of security cameras in public places comes with tremendous advantages and few drawbacks as well but the advantages can easily outweigh the drawbacks.
Submitted by cjsvig on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Surveillance cameras
  • Public safety
  • Deterrent
  • Evidence collection
  • Apprehend perpetrators
  • Public spaces
  • Invasion of privacy
  • Civil liberties
  • Abuse of power
  • Misuse
  • Cost implications
  • Monitoring
  • Maintenance
  • Essential services
  • Justice system
What to do next:
Look at other essays: