air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport constuction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily. Do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays there is
an
Remove the article
apply
show examples
ever-growing popularity in low-cost flight, which has led to an increase
air
Change preposition
in air
show examples
traffic and
consequently
more noise,
pollution
and airport
constuction
Correct your spelling
construction
.
This
essay completely agrees that governments should heavily tax
flights
companies
, mainly because it will lower the demand for
flights
and may motivate airways
companies
to reduce the
pollution
their planes create.
First
and foremost, heavy
taxes
will result in a smaller number of
flights
, which could lead to less traffic and
pollution
.
This
is simply because the consequence of high
taxes
will be a rise in the ticket price, and
therefore
a reduced number of individuals will be able to purchase flying tickets and will probably choose an alternative way of transportation.
For example
, a standard European family can nowadays fly to almost any destination inside Europe for less than 100 euros, and if that price will increase due to heavy
taxes
,
this
family may prefer to take the train
instead
of flying in order to reach its destination.
Secondly
, heavy
taxes
may encourage the airways
companies
to find ways to reduce the
pollution
their planes create. There are various technological solutions to lower the
amount
Change the quantifier
number
show examples
of
pollution
aircrafts
Correct your spelling
aircraft
show examples
produce, and these
companies
might invest more money in order to eliminate
pollution
, if the right incentive is created,
such
as the opportunity to avoid high
taxes
.
For instance
, if
goverments
Correct your spelling
governments
government
will declare that
flights
companies
can avoid high
taxes
if they can prove that their planes are less polluting, it can persuade them to invest in that direction. In conclusion, I strongly believe that a higher tax on air traffic could result in less
pollution
and noise, due to the potential smaller number of
flights
and an improved level of
pollution
by
airplanes
Change the spelling
aeroplanes
show examples
.
Submitted by nimrod.dar on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Environmental degradation
  • Noise pollution
  • Airborne emissions
  • Sustainable transportation
  • Aviation industry
  • Taxation measures
  • Economic ramifications
  • Regulatory framework
  • Technological advancements
  • Carbon footprint
  • Alternatives to flying
  • Government intervention
  • Green initiatives
  • Travel habits
  • Accessibility of travel
  • Fiscal deterrents
  • Consumer behavior
  • Global tourism
  • Market dynamics
  • Social equity
What to do next:
Look at other essays: