In some cities, governments have tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive or negative?

Nowadays, a great deal of attention has been paid to automobiles. In some parts of the world, the usage of personal

cars

is limited for the sake of reducing traffic jams. I believe

this

phenomenon brings merits for

people

because it prevents several problems caused by traffic jams and environmental issues.

To begin

with, the

first

reason why I support

this

is that

this

helps reducing conjunctions and incidents caused by these. In general, large cities,

such

as London, San Francisco and Tokyo, suffer from overuse of

cars

, and

people

live

Correct pronoun usage

who live

show examples

in those cities are often stacked in

cars

for more than one hour.

Furthermore

, it is important to highlight the fact that emergency vehicles fail to their original purpose due to conjunctions. Since countless

cars

are on the load, ambulance and other emergency

cars

are impossible to rush, and

hence

some invalid

people

die. On top of that, limiting the

use

of

cars

benefits

for

Change preposition

apply

show examples

the environment as well. In fact, global warming is critical. Statistically, the world temperature

have

Change the verb form

has

show examples

been increasing every year since the industrial revolution, along with the increase of the carbon dioxide level. As a matter of fact,

cars

are one of the largest contributors, and 23% of all greenhouse gases were discharged from the transportation sector in 2018.

Therefore

, if the government limits the

use

of private vehicles,

people

more likely to

use

public transport, and

hence

the global warming will be eased. To conclude, there are two reasons why I support limiting the

use

of

cars

.

This

is because it prevents several problems

such

as avoidable deaths and eases global warming.