Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In

this

age of

climate

crisis, some people irresponsibly ignore the major threat of

this

effect to their own planet, though other groups argue that we should exert some methods to take against all of these tremendous

climate

changes. To the best of my knowledge, I completely advocate the latter view that we need to tackle

this

problem

instead

of accepting it. There are various human activities that implicitly deteriorate our environment. In fact, people simply neglect the significance of

climate

change, even though it affects every corner of our planet.

However

, it seems like ignoring

this

in the short term has lots of benefits both to individuals and to organizations.

For example

, consumers live with no pressure on how much carbon dioxide could be emitted on their vehicles.

Furthermore

, companies can profit from the public will of cheaper products in that our aim for limiting carbon emissions is not central.

Nevertheless

, these ways of living are more cost-effective in the long run. In order to cope with

this

problem, the government and citizens should rely on developing and improving sources of green energy rather than innocently generating power that involves heavy combustion. From the authority aspect, they could introduce new laws to switch from using fossil fuels - the biggest cause of

climate

change- to clean, renewable energy. As individuals, we could try to limit our adverse influences on the

climate

,

such

as reducing the frequency of gasoline vehicles and buying eco-friendly products.

As a result

,

this

is an approachable solution to prevent potential harm to our nature. In conclusion, it is clear that humans are unable to live in a hazardous atmosphere.

Therefore

, we must address the problem as urgently as possible

instead

of living with it.