Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which side you favor

Nowadays, some country's government has approved the tobacco

law

that smokers

shouldn

Correct your spelling

should

't

smoke

in

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

public places namely work, restaurant, and school.

However

, the issue is not entirely

straight

Change the word

straightforward

show examples

forward

Rephrase

apply

show examples

other

countries

have

Add a missing verb

do have

show examples

not the purpose of making

this

. In the following paragraphs, I shall consider both sides of

this

very topical debate. On the one hand, some

countries

Add a missing verb

are concern

show examples

concern

Replace the word

concerned

show examples

that the regulation will violate human rights,

also

everyone has the right to do anything that an individual prefers to do, and one of them is to

smoke

in public areas.

This

seems that these

countries

' citizens think that their right to

smoke

is more important than others' right to be healthy. Another argument is who opposite

law

that the benefit coming from the sales of cigarettes makes up most of the state budget, so if they forbade people to

smoke

, it would destroy their economy.

For instance

: Cuba has been globally famous for cigarettes and exports its product to many other

countries

;

this

results in their surges economy.

By contrast

,

countries

which adhere

in

Change preposition

to

show examples

anti-smoking

law

has reduced exposure to secondhand

smoke

that

Correct pronoun usage

apply

show examples

results

Wrong verb form

resulting

show examples

in

the

Correct article usage

a

show examples

number of health problems

are decreased

Verb problem

apply

show examples

such

as heart disease and lung cancer. There is some evidence that the number of heart attacks has been reduced in Singapore and Canada by adopting

smoke

-free workplace laws.

In addition

, employees who are considerably addicted to cigarettes negatively affect job productivity long-term, losing

labor

Change the spelling

labour

show examples

time

due to

smoke

breaks and absenteeism.

For example

, there is

universal

Correct article usage

a universal

show examples

consensus that smokers

Add a verb

are

were

show examples

less productive than a nonsmoker.

Finally

, it appears that the restriction

also

decreases costs, that if

countries

comprehensive

Add a missing verb

have comprehensive

show examples

smoke

-free indoor air policies, the company's cleaning,

Correct word choice

and maintenance

show examples

maintenance

Correct word choice

and maintenance

show examples

expenses would be downed. In conclusion, I agree that

this

law

can indeed be a valuable activity,

with

Change preposition

apply

show examples

improving health,

Correct word choice

and

show examples

productivity and,

increase

Wrong verb form

increasing

show examples

company

Correct article usage

the company

show examples

's profit.