It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Today, study plays a crucial part in the development of a nation as a whole.

However

, it is often believed that it is impossible and rather useless for a country to provide admission to

university

Add an article

the university

show examples

to a larger per cent of students. If questioned, I agree with

this

view to a large extent. My inclination will be elaborated with examples in the ensuing write-up. There are many reasons for considering providing tertiary education unfeasible.

First

of all, not all students wish to devote a few years studying for a course. Many blue-collar jobs do not require long term studies and a few months of vocational training are enough.

Thus

, many youngsters prefer

this

option.

Moreover

, university costings are quite high and

thus

cannot be afforded by all the classes of society. High college fees and additional expenses like books, field trips, stationary materials tend to turn out of budget for many.

This

results in either performance deterioration or a surge in dropouts and ultimately results in wastage of time and money. Apart from

this

, it is not necessary that all the graduates who complete their tertiary studies manage to find employment.

This

leads to them being a burden to society. Looking from another perspective, it is said that each and everyone deserves a chance to pursue their dream and

thus

learning is necessary.

Therefore

, efforts should be made to impart knowledge to pupils who demand it. In conclusion, I would pen down that it is not feasible to provide tertiary education to everyone.

Therefore

the pupils should be carefully chosen so they as well as the society are benefitted as a whole.