Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

Many countries have seen a steep rise in the price of petrol in recent years. Some experts opine that it is the most effective solution to solve the
problems
related to growing
traffic
and
pollution
. Personally, I am not in favour of the aforementioned notion and the following paragraphs will expatiate certain other measures with lucid examples.
To begin
, it has been seen that augmentation in price petrol gives rise to myriad vexing
problems
rather than helping in the receding of
pollution
. To elucidate, many business vendors have to bear the burden of
this
increase because transportation tends to become costly and thereby, increasing the prices of goods and commodities.
For example
, in,Delhi the prices of petrol touched a new height which led to a rise in the cost of vegetables and dairy products.
As a result
, it becomes onerous for the folks to survive in
such
conditions ,especially those who live below the poverty line.
Nevertheless
, there are some other efficient solutions that can cater to the decimation of the
traffic
gridlocks and
pollution
. The foremost way is to control the population from drifting towards the urban areas because it puts pressure on a confined area and its resources.
In other words
,Better amenities and job opportunities should be provided in the towns, so that people refrain from moving to a city to earn their livelihood. As an instance,
although
Delhi has wider roads and many
pollution
control projects in place, still the city is struggling with these two
problems
due to its high-density population.
Therefore
, it is imperative to elevate the status of small towns to reduce the burgeoning
pollution
and
traffic
in the urban areas.
Moreover
, public transport has to be made more strong by improving the frequency and connectivity to all parts of the city, so that people opt for
this
in lieu of using their own vehicles for less number of travellers. To sum up, the government should look for several other viable solutions for these issues as they can be more justified and would not create a subsequent problem for the public. It is apparent that the
traffic
and
pollution
are increasing but one must
also
notice that it is only some part of the country that suffers from it,
hence
the above solutions can be considered to get rid of these
problems
.
Submitted by sonika.isher on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Discourage
  • Incentivize
  • Alternative energy
  • Public transportation
  • Lower-income
  • Carpool
  • Ride-sharing
  • Congestion
  • Urban planning
  • Pedestrian-friendly
  • Tax incentives
  • Electric and hybrid vehicles
  • Emissions standards
  • Cleaner vehicles
  • Congestion charges
  • Bicycle lanes
  • Sustainable
What to do next:
Look at other essays: