government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop to the country. Do you agree or disagree?

Today, some
people
believe that the contribution of
science
to society as a whole should be prioritized as an educational subject compared to other
disciplines
such
as music, art, etc. It is true that
science
can bring us more convenience and quality of life, but I still disagree with
this
statement and I believe that
people
should not ignore the equal importance of other subjects.
Science
education involving physics, mathematics and chemistry can be seen as the foundation or bridge to a direct link to the economy and technology. Cutting-edge products and inventions in developing countries often need
such
technologies to support them. Because
this
knowledge can meet their practical needs, more and more students and employees are willing to choose
such
disciplines
.
However
, in the long run, the
development
of a country cannot depend on
science
alone, as other
disciplines
also
bring multiple economic benefits and a broader perspective. Art or literature can
also
bring great profit and
development
as well as endless imagination to mankind,
thus
stimulating the economy and leading to great innovation.
Science
and other
disciplines
should be equally important to the nation as a whole. The absence of both can
also
hinder the
development
of individuals, which
then
affects
further
processes.
People
who are the
first
productive force should have the right to choose the subjects that interest them, rather than being driven by money.
People
also
need to be emotionally enriched by learning the arts and enjoying music, which can give them a positive attitude when they encounter difficulties and can
also
inspire them to embrace work or study. By stopping at just
science
learning, those who are imaginative and emotionally sensitive will be curtailed to the detriment of their efficiency and productivity. In conclusion,
although
science
education has an irreplaceable place in the
development
of the country, one should not underestimate the equal role of other sciences.
This
is why,
therefore
, I disagree with these recommendations.
Submitted by jyo87 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: