Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like . Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future , such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

It has been a controversial subject that people argued the university-level graduate should have the privilege of deciding the range they wished to pursue, while the others disagreed. While I am inclined to the former notion, I shall now discuss both sides of the coin.

To begin

Linking Words

with, a vital key towards success in later life is passion. Undergraduate students shall be in charge of the decision-making process themselves rather than being assigned to a STEM subject randomly, which may not in their favour.

For example

Linking Words

, a passionate music-related learner generally tends to thrive if the one working towards a music-oriented field, rather than being a software developer and coding without the spark.

Secondly

Linking Words

, grow-ups should be responsible for their subsequent life. Should the judgement is made by oneself,

this

Linking Words

is the judgement they never regret. In a nutshell, the future belongs to the individual student, not those so-called education authorities.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, science and technology subjects are becoming increasingly crucial and changing the world a better place, and the path to

that is

Linking Words

the students.

Firstly

Linking Words

, undergraduates should be aware all the essential transport infrastructures of worldwide countries were crafted by those who were undertaken in the aforementioned regions.

For instance

Linking Words

, the marvellous London bridge was constructed by tons of engineering learners with decades of dedication in the field.

Moreover

Linking Words

, learning the courses in the above-mentioned territory will promote the ability of critical thinking and analysing the occurred matters systematically. Real-world issues are being addressed by experts in STEM, rather than a musician who plays the saxophone in front of his audiences. In conclusion, despite the disadvantage of abolishing the possibility of future scientists, I argue that university life should follow the wish of oneself without any external disruptions and constraints.