under British and Australian laws a jury is a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case do you agree or disagree ? Give reason for your answer
#british #australian #laws #jury #case #access #information #defendant #record #person #crime #lawyers #practice #facts #decision #reason
It is debatable whether or not the communities still tend to judge people by connecting their past characters easily.
jury
has access to the defendant’s past criminal information. While
some people may think that the
past records may provide additional details, others believe that it is highly harmful to the accused person. Personally speaking, I may not agree with the Correct article usage
apply
afore- mentioned
statement as I tend to believe that old activities have no right to be involved in today’s cases. Despite the fact that people can change and grow after what they have been through, apparentlyCorrect your spelling
aforementioned
Add a comma
,
Moreover
, it is wiser by any chance to weigh only the present facts and evidence as the former facts have already been passed. By way of illustration is
a Unnecessary verb
apply
jury
may have accused the wrong person just because one has a bad criminal report. Thus
, to ,me it is only fair to exclude the earlier reports. On the other hand
, another opinion to consider is that repeated bad behaviours should be punished harder than the first one. Consequently
, in this
case, the jury
needs to know if one had made a similar action in the past. However
, given this
circumstance to
,Replace the word
too
me
it is better to not Correct pronoun usage
apply
implicate
Fix the infinitive
to implicate
this
belief. Like the previous statement, I am deeply concerned that a decision may not be valid if the jury
had the previous files. To conclude
, what British and Australian laws have done to hide the former facts sound
right Correct subject-verb agreement
sounds
for
me. An accountable judgement can be made if only the Change preposition
to
jury
excluded past defendants
records.Change noun form
defendants'
defendant's
Submitted by edobi on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
The easiest way to score well on the IELTS Task 2 writing portion is to structure your writing in a solid essay format.
A strong argument essay structure can be split up into 4 paragraphs, each containing 4 sentences (except the conclusion paragraph, which only contains 3 sentences).
Stick to this essay structure:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion