In countries with a high rate of unemployment, numerous pupils should do offered only predominant education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

Many people would like to say prior knowledge significant than secondary schooling Compared with the increasing rate of unemployment in numerous countries. It is a pretty and exciting topic. Secondary discipline is
also
essential for primary students.
Moreover
, I am afraid I have to disagree with
this
statement through some statements below reasons.
Firstly
, prior learning is a range of things' foundation. May believe it is one of the options ways to cross the financial burden for the government as they do not spend an amount of public funding on the school training and teacher observation.
However
, be more accurate, if the authority funding short-age used
this
sort of money to investment buy foods, drinks without contribution from the society. From my perspective, it is a short-insight to leading numerous of labour workforce.
Moreover
, due to institution discipline can not sufficient understanding of high technology. The essential children are unlikely to meet the demand for the technological global.
Secondly
, I am still wondering if the
the
Remove the redundancy
apply
show examples
state or society did not provide secondary education. It is not worth offering literacy chances for some people who do not want to find a great job. The secondary improvement might have a constructive to express their unique perspective on the character. it may lead to typical consequences related to the worse situation or increased crime rate. From those cases, primary pupils should take secondary information to have various insights into different cognitions. To sum up, politics should prioritise all types of observation to help increase the knowledge estimate and reduce the unemployment percentage.
Submitted by 514830126 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • universal access
  • knowledgeable workforce
  • economic growth
  • critical thinking
  • social equality
  • self-employment
  • entrepreneurship
  • cycle of poverty
  • vocational training
  • job market needs
  • specialized fields
  • modern economies
  • innovation
  • diverse and dynamic economy
What to do next:
Look at other essays: