Presently, a large number of media houses showcase more negative information than positive because it gets them more viewership time. I opine that
such
channels should adopt a balanced approach. I will be elucidating my thoughts in subsequent crumbs of writing.
Linking Words
Firstly
, we all are well aware that revenue from advertising is the primary source of earnings for news corporations. The primary reason why Linking Words
such
channels broadcast more unfortunate incidents is that they get more viewers. They disseminate data in Linking Words
such
a way that society is terrified and sometimes, curious to know more. Linking Words
Consequently
, Linking Words
this
leads to increased TRP and results in higher bids of advertising earnings. Linking Words
For example
, Global tech has recently presented that the average watching length of bad news on their channel is 25 minutes as compared to a marginal 7 minutes when good news is presented on their platform.
Linking Words
Secondly
, there are several kinds of people who would like to watch all sorts of reports. Television media companies should present both happy and sad content on their respective platforms in a way that does not outweigh each other. Linking Words
Also
, information regarding the progress being made by engineers in launching missiles, successful startups or gadget reviews will add more watch time, as people of all ages would like to watch them. Linking Words
For instance
, RPB a Denmark based broadcast channel has recently made changes to their strategy to show more informational content and saw a huge improvement in revenue.
To conclude, people like to stay updated with all the happenings around the globe. organisations should apply a neutral strategy that will allow creating a motivating environment around citizens and at the same time keep them well-informed.Linking Words
seth.nitesh