In countries with a high rate of unemployment, numerous pupils should do offered only predominant education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

With the increasing unemployment rate in numerous nations, the ministry, through secondary academic not constructive for the community with those population whose is no hope to finding a job. I'm afraid I entirely have to disagree with

this

short-sight. In general, we should do our part to make sure that as many societies finish high school and university as possible

First

, prior learning is a range of things' foundation. May believe it is one of the options ways to cross the financial burden for the police as they do not spend an amount of public funding on the school training and teacher observation.

However

, be more accurate, if the union funding short-age used

this

sort of money to investment buy foods, drinks without contribution from the society. From my perspective, it is a short-insight to leading numerous of

labor

Change the spelling

labour

show examples

workforce.

Moreover

, due to institution discipline can not sufficient understanding of high technology. The essential children are unlikely to meet the demand for the technological global.

Secondly

, I am still wondering if the state or society did not provide secondary education. It is not worth offering literacy chances for some people who do not want to find a great job. The secondary improvement might have a constructive to express their unique perspective on the character. It may lead to typical consequences related to the worse situation or increased crime rate. From those cases, primary pupils should take secondary information to have various insights into different cognitions. to summarise, the authority should prioritize all types of observation to help increase the knowledge rate, must not take short-cuts, and reduce the unemployment percentage