Many countries are experiencing population growth and need more homes. Should these new houses be constructed in existing cities or should new towns be built in the countryside?

Undeniably population is a popular topic

that is

debated by many, but that can not be circumvented by anyone, because the opinion on

this

matter will determine

one

's attitude. Before rendering my point of view,let us discuss both sides of the argument. Some people indicate that due the urbanisation, new houses should be constructed in existing towns by recognising the fact

that is

an adaptation.

For example

, relocating somewhere else means you need to adapt to

this

modern place and people as well.

Therefore

,they would rather inhabiting in the same infrastructure

instead

of being far away from them. That

also

leads to another worth noting advantage which is comfortableness. For

one

thing, if you are situated in a town, you will be provided with everything you need, a market for essential needs,public transports for travelling and so on.

Hence

, they opt effortless way rather than

such

a complicated

one

.

However

,

this

case is ignorant of a fact

that is

overcrowding.

For example

, the individuals preventing old metropolitan areas from developing congestion,

thus

they can be free out of stress in their lastest homes which are located in the countryside.

In addition

, pollution is

one

of the reasons it is wise for them to move to the

second

house. Taking the aforementioned ideas into consideration, I wholeheartedly observe so many advantages compared to disadvantages. My

first

reason for

that is

because of the transportation, it takes time to establish the essential needs of the people, at least 5 years to be exact.

In addition

, creating new structures not only mean pollution but

also

deforestation.