Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are done alone. Do you agree or disagree?

Apparently,

group

works

could bring about numerous essential

life

skills

for

people

, from collaboration to communication

skills

. But despite

this

discussion, I reckon that in order to achieve essential

skills

for living, both individual and

team

activities

are of the essence at the same level. On the one hand, as mentioned above, there are a considerable number of advantages associated with teamwork helping every person gain necessary

life

skills

.

In other words

, playing a role in a

team

teaches the abilities which do not make sense while doing them alone. Take negotiation as an example. It is not viable to improve the art of negotiating and convincing other

people

in individual

activities

. As another instance, in teamwork, the members of the

team

learn to share the

activities

which are needed to reach the final objective.

This

improves social and collaborative

skills

.

On the contrary

, based on the type of goal and the personality of

people

, alone working provides some useful benefits to improve

skills

.

For instance

, introverted

people

are extremely more efficient when doing

works

privately.

Additionally

, the nature of some

activities

is based on single work and concentration. In

this

kind of

works

, a different

group

of

life

skills

are developed.

For example

, it is more acceptable to cook individually rather than in a

group

, because in

this

kind of work nothing beneficial is learnt in a

group

. To conclude,

although

both individual and

team

activities

have the potential of bringing about some opportunities to learn

skills

for

life

, none of them could outweigh the other due to different kinds of

people

and

works

. It is useful for parents, schools and employers to plan for a mixture of both types to receive the best results.