Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Few people believe that interview is the basic form of selection for a suitable candidate, whereas, other individuals suggest that there are better methods to employ a candidate. I agree with the former view to a large extent.
This
essay will discuss my idea and shall justify my opinion.
To begin
with, most Multinational companies have a structured way to recruit an applicant. They do it by interviewing a shortlisted nominee. To elaborate,
Interviews
can help to understand the characteristic of the person attending, their approach towards the problem, and how efficient are their solutions.
Interviews
can
also
show how good is his or her analytical skills and knowledge about the work.
For example
, the interviewer can set up a question
such
that he can have a brief idea of how good is his skills and knowledge. Another reason why
interviews
should be a reliable method for choosing an aspirant is, they are flexible to conduct. They have better responses rather than mail questions. Even the people who are not able to write or read can verbally attend the interview.
For example
, jobs like daily wages, security are certain sectors where people might not be able to write or read, for
such
jobs interview is the better method to hire.
Although
there are new ways to hire a suitable contestant, it is by conducting a competition at the national level and letting the participants do their best to deliver the desired outcome. In
such
a way companies can find excellent candidates even from
second
and
third
league colleges.
For example
, Larsen and Toubro conduct Technothrone every two years to hire direct fresher from college. To sum up, Even though there are new approaches building up for the hiring process,
however
,
interviews
are still to be the most efficient process to employ a correct candidate.
Submitted by harshpatel191936 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: