In some cities, the government has tired to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hours. Do you think this development is positive or negative?

The government officials in some cities have tackled the menace of traffic bottleneck and the imposition of a congestion tax during peak hours is referred to as a specific measurement to address the problem. In my opinion, it is a negative development due to the economic impacts on individuals and the non-substantial benefits. One issue we should regard is that levying a traffic jam tax has a crucial economic effect on daily commuters who are using their own vehicles. In terms of some professions, it's largely believed that the private modes of transportation have outweighed the public transport network because of job requirements.
For instance
, Grab drivers need to commute by their cars on the roads all day to pick up customers and they can not avoid travelling during rush hours
as a result
. It seems to be not fair that they have been forced to pay additional overpopulation levy out of their salaries.
Moreover
, due to the pandemic, the working class has struggled to meet their daily lives and
this
kind of duty might create an excessive financial burden to them. Another issue, in my opinion, is the short-term benefit of
this
measurement. There is no guarantee that it could decrease the amount of traffic volume. Implying the congestion tariff could solely discourage individuals to limit their usage of private vehicles and stimulus them to use the public modes of transport
instead
in the short run. Eventually, the commuters accept the truth that they would rather pay cost than commute by public transport network due to its drawbacks. A more structured approach focusing on improving road infrastructure or shared transportation could bring more long-term benefits to society. In conclusion,
although
some city authorities implied a congestion contribution during rush hours to ensure decongestion, it brought too many problems to be considered as a positive trend.
Submitted by dothuy.usd on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • congestion tax
  • rush hour
  • public transportation
  • greenhouse gas emissions
  • financially burdensome
  • traffic displacement
  • infrastructure
  • sustainable urban development
  • cycle lanes
  • pedestrian areas
  • urban environment
What to do next:
Look at other essays: