Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development
In many corporations, academic
university
degrees are considered to be more paramount than hands-on experience by some employers when they seek new candidates.However
, I feel that this
is a negative development and I will explain the reasons here.
There are two factors to explain why some job recruiters prefer university
qualifications to life experience when recruiting new employees. Firstly
, in many occupations, formal academic degrees seem to be the top priority of many employers when selecting new applicants. In order to become a doctor, for example
, a candidate has to acquire a great deal of medical knowledge at university
as well as
carry out experiments.Additionally
, this
trend may be a great way to save time
for employee recruiters.This
is because formal academic candidates are ready to start working,
and allow recruiters to spend their Remove the comma
apply
time
training non-academic applicants on how to work properly eventually, this
saved
Wrong verb form
saves
time
and can be used in other valuable ways.
Nevertheless
, I think that this
is a negative development and both academic and non-academic job hunters should receive an equal chance in the recruitment process. In some cases, people decide to work right after school in order to support their families and gain practical skills and experience.Furthermore
, after a long time
of working in a real work environment, people are also
capable of doing most assigned tasks without a university
education.A typical example can be seen in the case of Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook, who was the most successful in the technology industry without holding any formal education in this
field.
In conclusion,this
trend is attributable to two main reasons, and I firmly believe that this
is a
not positive progress for the above-mentioned argumentsRemove the article
apply
Submitted by madking744 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
The essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic and presents relevant arguments. However, consider providing more depth in the analysis and development of ideas to enhance the overall response.
coherence cohesion
The essay structure is clear, with a proper introduction, body, and conclusion. However, the connections between ideas could be further developed to improve the overall coherence and cohesion of the essay.
lexical resource
The lexical resource used in the essay is adequate, but there is room for improvement in the use of a wider range of vocabulary to express ideas more precisely and vividly.
grammatical range
The essay demonstrates a good command of grammatical structures, but there are some instances of repetitive sentence structures and minor errors. Aim to vary sentence structures and ensure consistency in verb tense usage.