Do you agree or disagree with the statement that the government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country?
Many people believe that
science
plays a much more vital role in the development of one
country
than other subjects
so the government are suggested allocating more money to science
education. Personally, I agree that it is crucial to promote science
curriculum at school, yet some other subjects
, history ,for example
, should also
be financially supported.
On the one
hand, raising funds for science
curricula like mathematics or physic is conducive to the growth of one
country
. In reality, a professional mathematician could utilize statistics to make relatively accurate predictions on many aspects such
as economy, politics,… Therefore
, those become the firm base for the authority to actively avoid severe risks. Furthermore
, it is proven that the more researchers and engineers that one
nation owns, the more valuable achievements could be gained. Take the USA for instance
, this
country
has spent billions of dollars on improving facilities and infrastructure, laboratories for example
, which are applied in teaching science
. As a result
, America has reaped the fruits of becoming the pioneer of every development in the world.
On the other hand
, I believe that the government should not solely distribute money for science
as the importance of some social subjects
is enormous. Take history ,for example
, this
is often known as one
of the most boring subjects
at school and a few students give preference to this
subject. However
, learning history is proven to be very beneficial: Not only students could have an intensive insight into past events, but also
their patriotism is improved. In reality, there are a lot of well-qualified researchers choosing to oppose their countries due to a lack of historical knowledge. As a result
, it is necessary for the government to pay attention to other subjects
besides
science
.
In conclusion, the huge role of science
subject on building a strong country
is undeniable ranging from predicting possible risks as well as raising developments, but it is not a good idea to allocate all the money to this
subject since the social curriculum is crucial too. It is predicted that the authority will focus on real experience in order to lessen the boredom of those social subjects
.Submitted by nguyentatthang1981 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.