Many countries spend a lot of money in the arts. Some people think investment in the arts is necessary, but others say money is better spent on public service and facilities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Arts

has becomes the most scarce existing need in the following days. Many countries spend enormous

money

on their

arts

and culture,

,

Change the punctuation

apply

show examples

consequently

Add a comma

,consequently

show examples

it's become the potential need of every citizen. On the flip

side

Add a comma

,side

show examples

few individuals thought that it is better to use that

money

in the progress of society to provide better facilities.

however

, both options will be discussed and the visible solutions will be suggested. On the one side, I thought that

arts

are a great profession and a lot of people have become the breadwinner for their families, as well as they are the pivotal asset of their government. For ,example every country in the world requires some poignant paintings in offices to represent their culture and customs. That's why

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

every nation should need dapper artists. On the other side, some folks argue that it's a waste of

money

and government should spend that

money

to fulfil the requirements of citizens. They said that it's not compulsory to promote

arts

in the community.

For instance

, the city planner should use that

money

for infrastructure and facilitate residential in the best way. Putting it all together, I assume that

although

they are right in some way in

this

cutting-edge era it's the requirement of every country.