Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

The name of an

artist

is a holy thing, you Can not give it to anybody by chance. People Should earn it. In my opinion, if a government or any other organization dictate to artists what create, the name of the result is not

art

anymore, so, I definitely disagree with

this

statement . To give a clear example of my argument, in the middle of every evolution in history, there are lots of brilliant songs or performances which help the nation to pass through dark Situations and demonstrate hope and freedom,

this

kind of

art

makes folks brave and gives them motivation. Meanwhile, imagine what happens if the government restricts artists to be creative and not allowed them to allocate their passion. On the way that they believed. on that matter, most of the remarkable

art

that we know nowadays was not exist.

Art

is a spiritual way,

that is

link mind to body. you can play a significant song whenever lost your connection with material stuff. and just listen to your instinct .

However

if someone eliminated imagination and dreams of an

artist

, we never can expect a joyful outcome. In conclusion, everyone who produces Something Can do

this

when their mind is free of a checklist of should or should not things, their mind can be creative, as the result of being free of everything. A government that censors their

artist

, it's a dictator who has fear of their

artist

and I believe that the freedom of a nation can evaluate of

this

matter how much the artists of

this

country is free to express their

art