In 
 day and age, the number of full-time housekeeping 
 is constantly growing. Some believe 
 should pay them salaries. In my opinion, 
, I disagree with 
 idea due to the potential social implications and the increase in financial burden on authorities. 
 essay will analyze these factors, using examples from the UK government and Stanford University to prove my arguments.
On the one hand, full-time housekeeping 
 seem to need financial support from 
. The reason behind 
 is twofold. 
, they look after their 
 at the cost of being unemployed and giving up income resources. 
, the expenditure on raising children is rather high, especially during the period when children were very young and cannot take care of themselves. 
, some of these 
 might confront financial difficulties without support from the state.
That being said, it is unreasonable for authorities to pay housing 
 wages. The primary reason is 
 measure would be unfair to the dual income 
 and in turn, have a negative effect on society. 
 because some working 
 might feel upset and quit their jobs
,Remove the comma
show examples
  if they could not get subsidies from 
 merely because they have a job. In fact, recent research from the UK government shows that the unemployed rate in countries which can offer relatively greater amounts of maternity subsidy is clearly higher than that in other countries. 
, it is possible that people might prefer to be unemployed if 
 provided them with salaries for full-time keeping housing and 
 will lead to a brain drain in society.
Another reason is that 
 governmental support would pose a heavy financial burden on 
, leading to budget cuts for other social systems. A study from Stanford University shows that in the US there are around half a million new full-time housekeeping 
 increasing each year. 
 would cost authorities a fortune once they decided to pay these 
mothersChange noun form
show examples
  salaries. 
, the budget for other social aspects 
 as medical, educational and transport systems will inevitably be cut down.
To conclude, 
 full-time housing 
 may need temporary financial help to overcome their difficulties in raising 
, claiming that they should receive a salary from the government may not be a wise option, as it will cause so many multiple negative social implications. I personally think that being unemployed to better look after 
 is merely a personal choice. 
 people should be responsible for their own and, while responsibility should not fall on 
.