Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which side you favor.

Nowadays, some states implemented a law prohibiting smoking in public places,

whereas

other states prefer not to impose

law

Fix the agreement mistake

laws

show examples

against

this

matter. It appears

to be

Verb problem

that

show examples

both supporters and opponents have their own sides, and I will outline both arguments in

this

essay. On the one hand, proponents of restricting

tobacco

usage in crowded locations, cite that,

this

policy might reduce

consumption

Correct article usage

the consumption

show examples

of cigarettes.

To point the

Verb problem

The

show examples

evidence that

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

countries whose

tobacco

industries are immense,

therefore

producing

tobacco

occupies half of their

economy

Replace the word

economic

show examples

budget, might face recession.

Moreover

, critics

also

highlight, that regulators have no intent to restrict people’s

preference

Fix the agreement mistake

preferences

show examples

. Authorities who support

this

idea,

claims

Correct subject-verb agreement

claim

show examples

that

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

it is a personal matter to choose whether or not to smoke cigarettes.

However

, opponents of banning or limiting

tobacco

usage in enclosed areas, state that,

tobaccos

Fix the agreement mistake

tobacco

show examples

bring hazardous effect to the community, particularly for infants, and

elderly

Correct article usage

the elderly

show examples

.

Following

this

social demand, governments adopt and implement laws to protect their citizens from exposure to

tobacco

smoke in enclosed public places, workplaces and public transport.

Furthermore

, countries which, support the idea, are among the developed nations, that have advanced organizations,

constitutions

Correct word choice

and constitutions

show examples

. For instance,

according to

researchers in Scandinavian countries,

where

Rephrase

apply

show examples

the adoption of comprehensive legislation led to very significant drops in

tobacco

smoke exposure within

short

Add an article

the short

a short

show examples

time period. To supporters of

this

idea, the benefits of

this

law are convincing.

Overall

, I would tend to side with the opponents of smoke-free regulations. It seems to be reasonable to legislate smoke-free control within public spaces.