Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low- cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations Some people say that governments should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily. Do you agree or disagree?

Travelling by
air
has become more popular in the
last
few decades, thanks to the affordability of cheap flights. It has created some positive impacts
such
as boosting the local economy of the tourist destinations but it
also
comes with some drawbacks like
air
pollution and more airports being constructed. Some people think the
government
should impose higher taxes on low-cost commercial flights in order to tackle the problem, but I do not think
this
approach is totally workable to reduce
air
traffic.
First
of all, the
government
should only impose a heavier tax on airlines that are not environmentally friendly. Budget airlines that place importance on reducing carbon dioxide emissions ,
for example
, should not be penalised, as they are equally responsible towards our environment as their bigger counterparts.
On the other hand
, certain better measures can be taken to hamper
this
problem.
Government
can impose laws on airline companies to limit their flight frequencies or to limit the number of greenhouse gases that they produced per flight.
This
will lawfully force them to find alternative ways rather than relying heavily on fossil fuel as a source of energy.
Government
can build better public transport,
for instance
,roads and railways , to encourage the general public to
travel
by land.
Furthermore
, they should develop and promote the local attractions along the routes so people will be tempted to use trains or buses to
travel
. In conclusion, I think heavier taxes will not stop people to
travel
by
air
. In order to solve the problem of increasing
air
traffic and its detrimental effect on the environment , the
government
should take steps to promote other modes of
travel
, and to penalise those flight companies that do not have policies to protect the environment.
Submitted by chiniey on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • air traffic
  • noise pollution
  • airport construction
  • environmental damage
  • low-cost passenger flights
  • affordability of air travel
  • taxing
  • reduce
  • growth
  • implementing
  • alternative measures
What to do next:
Look at other essays: