In the past, many male leaders have led our society to conflicts and violence. The world would be better governed and more peaceful if it was ruled by women. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some believe that female leaders could build a more harmonious global community since a vast number of male leaders in

history

have made numerous decisions to raise wars and conflicts. I totally disagree with

this

view mainly because the decision to start a

war

is quite often a collective decision of a nation and

thus

individual leaders should not take the blame. First of all,

history

has proven that conflicts and violence are often a product of long-term inequality and hatred in which the society as a whole collectively votes to start a

war

.

For instance

, when the German military followed the instruction of Hitler to engage in invading neighbouring countries in World

War

II, the entire population had been struggling with economic difficulties for more than a decade before the initial call for

war

. Considering

this

as a collective decision of every German to fight for economic prosperity and wealth in a brutal way, I do not think Hitler or any other individual should be fully responsible for raising international conflicts.

Instead

, the fundamental cause of

war

is deeply rooted in various social factors that lead to desperate, aggressive behaviours of a group.

Moreover

, there is little evidence that gender has a significant impact on the leadership style of a person. In fact, recent research has revealed that some other factors

such

as personality, educational background and family

history

contributed

Wrong verb form

contribute

show examples

greatly to a leader's approach to conflict management. We have seen numerous queens in

history

,

for example

, the

Egypt

Correct your spelling

Egyptian

show examples

Queen, who had incredible military talent and was inclined to utilize military power to obtain wealth from foreign nations, was quite aggressive despite being a female.

Therefore

, I believe we should look at a range of factors thoroughly when we attempt to determine whether a candidate for a national leadership role is belligerent or not. In conclusion,

while

we tend to relate a President’s aggressiveness to his or her gender

accordingly

, there is no obvious proof to illustrate whether being a male can lead to a more belligerent approach to tackling cross-border conflict.