Some believe that new science related to criminal forensics should be used to look at old cases. To what extent do you agree or disagre

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Many concerned parties today feel that new innovations should be used to prove previous cases which are in the past might be closed with wrong ideas and explanations. I completely disagree with
this
statement . Let me through some lights with lucid examples. Finding or searching for truth is so difficult in
this
world where all of the corners of the universe are full of fake people's messages,even technology helps the government to find the original event of the crime. First and foremost,
it is clear that
using forensics is expensive , and spending money on old cases is a waste of money. Maybe it is useful for nations and populations to spend
this
budget to re-education criminals or it is
also
beneficial for rule prosperity if society invests in these people's future and education .
For example
, in Uzbekistan union pays attention to finding or opening bygone occurrences
instead
of
this
, it prefers to spend means on societal things which play a key role in the individual's life like roads hospitals and schools.
Secondly
, living with looking at the past is not important and it never plays an integral part in people's life. At first glance, old evidence
maybe do
Wrong verb form
may
show examples
not
lose
Wrong verb form
have lost
show examples
its origins,
however
,
this
is not true in all situations. What I mean by
this
in the past periods , there
is
Wrong verb form
was
show examples
not any kind of security surveillance, street cameras and so on . Indeed, police officers and judges had difficulties with recovering criminals.
Moreover
, there were some occurrences and demographics which were wrongly prosecuted by the politicians. Maybe we find one innocent casualty, in place of a lot of money and some folk's health.
For instance
, it is impossible for any kind of forensics to open instances which happened about 20 years ago. Thereby, the evidence loses its origins.
To sum up
, new science should be used to look at news instances
instead
of old ones.
This
essay
argued
Wrong verb form
argues
show examples
why
this
idea is completely wrong .
Submitted by uluga2002 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Ensure that the essay fully addresses the prompt and provides a clear position on the topic. Provide a balanced discussion by considering both perspectives and offering a clear stance.
coherence and cohesion
Organize the essay with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. Use cohesive devices to link ideas and ensure a clear progression of thoughts throughout the essay.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • criminal forensics
  • advancements
  • evidence
  • old cases
  • science
  • technology
  • reopening
  • time-consuming
  • costly
  • new evidence
  • pursuit of justice
  • reexamining
  • overall opinion
What to do next:
Look at other essays: