The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pictures show the layout of a science
park
in 2008 and the changes that have taken place up until now. Taken as a whole, the park
has gone through a number of major changes, with the most significant one being the construction of new features, which have been made possible at the expense of green spaces. It is also
evident that the road infrastructure in the park
's perimeter has been significantly upgraded.
In 2008, the park
was accessible from the western, eastern and northeastern sides by car. There was a car park
in the centre
of the science park
for visitors, which served the purpose of a bridge between business units in the west and the cyber security building in the southeast. Other major building complexes: a round-shaped IT centre
and offices adjoining the reception were also
part of the science park
. We can also
see a railroad stretching from the west to the east in the southern part of the plan, and the remaining territory was either woodland or grassland.
By now, a large number of developments have occurred in the park
. Included in these were the construction research and development building to the left-hand side of offices, the conversion of the reception into a university hub, and the enlargement of the cyber security premises (now it has an L-shape). Moreover
, the existing IT centre
has been converted into an innovation centre
, while
the car park
has been approximately halved in size. Finally
, transport facilities have been improved in the area by building a railroad station, laying brand-new footpaths throughout, building a bus station in the east, and adding a separate lane for cyclists.Submitted by tjumagul67 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Linking words: Don't use the same linking words: "also".
▼
Introduction: The introduction is missing.
▼
Conclusion: The conclusion is too long.
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
▼
Common mistake: Your writing should be 150-250 words.
Basic structure: Change the second paragraph.
▼
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
▼
Vocabulary: Replace the words park, centre with synonyms.
▼
Vocabulary: Rephrase the word "show" in your introduction.
▼
Vocabulary: Only 6 basic words for charts were used.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "changes" was used 2 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "number of" was used 2 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "significant" was used 2 times.
▼
Vocabulary: Use several vocabularies to present the data in the second paragraph.
▼