“Eating too much sugar is harmful for our health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people’s sugar consumption, while others think that it is an individual’s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat.

In recent years, a debate regarding

sugar

Use synonyms

consumption

Use synonyms

has emerged.

In particular

Linking Words

,

while

Linking Words

everyone agrees that eating too much

sugar

Use synonyms

is detrimental to health, there are opposite views about who has to intervene to limit

sugar

Use synonyms

consumption

Use synonyms

, with some

people

Use synonyms

saying that should be the

government

Use synonyms

and others affirming

that is

Linking Words

an individual responsibility. In

this

Linking Words

essay, a brief explanation of

this

Linking Words

debate will be given. It is undoubtedly true that

government

Use synonyms

action could largely resolve the

sugar

Use synonyms

consumption

Use synonyms

issue. In fact, an eventual

government

Use synonyms

ban on unhealthy food could effectively address the problem at its root, eliminating the supply of

people

Use synonyms

eating too much

sugar

Use synonyms

.

Moreover

Linking Words

,

government

Use synonyms

campaigns against other substances have already proved to be effective, so

this

Linking Words

could be applied to

this

Linking Words

case too.

For instance

Linking Words

, anti-smoking campaigns, promoted by some countries, have reduced the number of cigarettes smoked.

Finally

Linking Words

, on a moral side, it is the

government

Use synonyms

's duty to protect its citizens, and

this

Linking Words

protection comes

also

Linking Words

from guaranteeing their well-being. Given all

this

Linking Words

, it is not entirely inaccurate to say that it is the

government

Use synonyms

's responsibility to limit

sugar

Use synonyms

consumption

Use synonyms

.

On the other hand

Linking Words

,

people

Use synonyms

should be free to decide what is better for them. Actually, limited

consumption

Use synonyms

of

sugar

Use synonyms

could be beneficial and, for

this

Linking Words

, a

government

Use synonyms

cannot ban it completely, but should only inform the population about possible health risks.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, if someone wants to eat more

sugar

Use synonyms

, there are many ways of doing so, even if the political power tries to stop it.

For example

Linking Words

, historically, when there has been a ban on some substances, almost always a black market emerged and

this

Linking Words

type of trade was not regulated, with all the dangers that derive from

this

Linking Words

.

In addition

Linking Words

, as stated above,

people

Use synonyms

should have the possibility to decide for themselves, without having external forces imposing their views. Surely, relying completely on the population's sensibility on the matter could be not as effective as a centralized policy. In conclusion, it could be said that both views have their strong and weak points.

Whereas

Linking Words

citizens should be free to take decisions for their health, it is true that not only they could not reduce

consumption

Use synonyms

, but

also

Linking Words

increase it.

For

Linking Words

this

Linking Words

reason, a hybrid approach should be preferred, with public-funded information campaigns to spread awareness on the overconsumption of

sugar

Use synonyms

, but letting the population decide what they should do.