The table shows the percentage of government expenditure on health care in five countries in 2006 as well as the proportions of 24-30-year-olds working in medical services. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The table illustrates the proportions of the government budgets spent on health

care

and young medical staff of 24-30 ages in 2006. It is conspicuous that the expenditure on health

care

in those five countries was much less that than used for young medical professionals in 2006. The biggest disparity existed in

Poland

, where most of the budget was allocated to young medical

care

personnel but the least to medical aid, compared with the other four nations. In the given year, as for the expenditure on medical services, Italy ranked first among those countries, whose investment accounted for 27 per cent of the total budget.

However

, the figures for the remaining nations were all relatively low (all of them were under 15 per cent). The least percentage of national spending on health

care

could be seen in

Poland

, which was just 5%. It is

also

worth mentioning more than half of the government budget was used to support 24-30-year-old medical staff in

Poland

, which was well over twice as high as that in Finland (a quarter). Italy's investment in doctors and nurses of young ages was merely behind

Poland

, with 40 per cent, and was followed by Spain and Iceland (29% and 25% respectively).