In many countries, smoking is now illegal in public places. Many people believe that such a ban is justified. Do you agree or disagree?

In a large number of nations, it is not allowed to

smoke

in public areas

anymore

Replace the word

any more

show examples

, and many argue that

this

is a reasonable measure.

This

essay agrees with the statement because prohibiting smoking in common spaces improves non-smokers´ health condition and helps those who

smoke

to give up the addiction. Considering

firstly

the benefits for non-smokers, banning smoking in public places will be beneficial for the health of those who do not

smoke

. It has been shown that when they share the same place with someone who is smoking, the

smoke

they inhale through passive

smoke

is highly harmful because they inhale noxious particles which their body is not used to.

Therefore

, it can ultimately lead to respiratory diseases and cancer.

For instance

, since Portugal introduced

this

rule 15 years ago, lung cancer rates plummeted in the country. Another advantage of

this

solution is that active smokers would reduce the number of cigarettes they

smoke

because there are not many places left for that activity.

As a result

, they might either

smoke

only a few cigarettes on a regular basis or they would actually give up.

This

is equally beneficial for their health, as aforementioned, by reducing the number of mouth and lung cancer.

For example

, when

this

law was implemented in the UK, the amount of smokers has been dropping since

then

. In conclusion, I am a vehement supporter that the recent ban on smoking in common areas implemented in some countries is justified because it can help non-smokers to keep their healthy lung shape by avoiding contact with second-hand

smoke

, and

also

helps smokers to give up.