Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Staying in a comfort zone rather than questing for a better life seems guilty or even dull for some youngsters. I believe both sides have their own motives and in the following essay, I
would
share my insights into these two different opinions and explain why I am sided with the actions of chasing a quality life.
One major reason for people to stand with their current situation, even if it is bad, is the disappointment of society. Wrong verb form
will
For example
, due to
inflation and economic depression, a large number of companies collapsed and choose
to cut staffing levels. There are no high-paid jobs available on the labour market. Wrong verb form
chose
Therefore
, more and more employees start to quiet-quitting
by minimizing the efforts that they Correct your spelling
quit
spent
on their working hours and saving more energy for their off-duty time. Another reason for people to give up changing existing ways of living can be their financial status. Changing a lifestyle completely requires adaptability and resilience. Wrong verb form
spend
For instance
, breadwinners of a family could find it hard to make a swift change in their work positions owing to mortgages.
On the other hand
, One main reason for those pioneers, who like to overcome different hurdles to get a higher social status, is the demand for excitement or a sense of achievement. Experiences are priceless to them. Some undergraduates even spare no expense on obtaining an overseas scholarship to enhance their careers. In Taiwan, studying abroad, in America in particular
, is the favourite option to invest in to build a brilliant future.
In conclusion, I believe either way can be a good lifestyle. The former supports stability in family units, the latter seizes the opportunity to get a noble and high social rank. I, myself, sided with the latter idea because I'm a person that
can not deal with a boring way of living. Correct pronoun usage
who
Furthermore
, some said "the only constant is change", embracing change is a norm in this
ever-changing world.Submitted by qooe212156822000 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
The essay demonstrates a reasonable understanding of the topic but lacks depth and clarity in presenting viewpoints and supporting examples.
coherence and cohesion
The essay has a clear introduction and conclusion, but the body paragraphs lack clear organization and coherence. There is a need for better linking of ideas.