People without occupations are increasing;
hence
, people suppose that children solely need to study until high school. From my perspective, I am totally against Linking Words
this
viewpoint and will elaborate on some reasons to justify Linking Words
this
stance.
First and foremost, the primary rationale would appear to be better growth. Linking Words
That is
to say, when children possess more opportunities to access education, they can develop all aspects of their mental and physical health. It means that they can study some subjects, typically math, gymnastics, and science. Linking Words
Therefore
, they can boost their brains to acquire new information and have sufficient knowledge for working in the future and enhance their major competence with top-notch initiatives.
Linking Words
Furthermore
, another motive relates to higher soft skills. To be more specific, they not only broaden their horizons but Linking Words
also
receive a variety of meaningful lessons and experiences pertaining to strange situations. Linking Words
Moreover
, if they are taught for a longer time, they will meet some practical behaviours and Linking Words
then
know how to apply their expertise to solve difficult circumstances. Linking Words
As a result
, they know the ways to go through ups and downs Linking Words
as well as
obstacles. Linking Words
For example
, they are educated in good communication abilities to team up with their peers in order to obtain the best results in their work. From that, young generations effortlessly implement these things for their career later and reach their summit of professions.
In conclusion, it would be logical Linking Words
to conclude
that giving up going to high school should be rejected by virtue of better growth and higher soft skills. In fact, higher education should be advocated because of its numerous merits for future work.Linking Words
maianhdt12