Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. Do you agree or disagree?

In the present world, governments bear noteworthy expenditures for the

arts

. Even music and theatre are among the many

forms

of

art

just some examples in which governments invest a lot of

money

.

Nonetheless

, I strongly disagree that government investment in the

arts

is a waste of

money

and that they must invest

this

money

in public services

instead

. Analysing how these

arts

reflect our interior emotions, and so how much they are part of us,

as well as

the key role they have from an economic point of view will prove

this

.

Firstly

, the many

art

forms

have been a major way of expressing ourselves over the years. Unsurprisingly, a great majority of the population feel the urge to listen to music, go to concerts and to the theatre to feel better after a period of mere working life.

This

is a human need we cannot live without.

Therefore

,

this

makes it clear that spending on

arts

is essential for the well-being of citizens.

Secondly

, the

arts

represent a great source of income for a country, especially mine.

For example

, some Italian cities,

such

as Rome and Venice, rely on tourism for their sustainability. Since tourists are attracted by the extreme variety of our

art

forms

, the government cannot stop investing in any of them.

Thus

, it becomes apparent that investing in the

arts

is not a waste of

money

. To summarize, it is fundamental for the well-being of citizens,

as well as

for the revenue stream of one country to invest

money

in the

arts

.

Consequently

, the idea of inventing that

money

in other sectors,

such

as public services, cannot be supported. After a thorough analysis of

this

subject, it is recommended government will continue to invest

money

in all

forms

of

art

.