Recruiting new employees can be a long and painful process. Some employers conduct
to select new workers. I disagree with the given statement, which says that the
is not a reliable
, and other
are better. I believe that
is a reliable
, but there are many other
which are equally good, and the choice is on the recruiters as to which technique they find suitable for their needs.
There are many reasons why the
is preferred by some employers for hiring new staff.
, by the ,
the recruiters can get an idea about the personality and social skills of the potential employees. In
, there is face-to-face interaction and the candidates have to answer impromptu questions, from which personality mindset can be judged.
, by asking some case study-type questions, employees can judge traits like the ability to handle pressure, confidence and the ability to think outside the box.
, there are many other selection
with varied advantages. One other common
is a written test.
is preferred when the focus is on judging the theoretical knowledge of the person. Another conventional selection basis is group discussion.
is good where a major job requirement of the company is conversational skills
sales jobs. Group discussion can determine the convincing power of an individual.
but not least, there can be a combination of all the three
like written tests, followed by group discussion and
.
is the most thorough of all the
checking everything from personality traits to knowledge and
communication ability.
It is evident that different
have different advantages and the best mechanism cannot be singled out. It depends upon the situation.
,
assess a person’s individual ideology better
written tests are more about knowledge and expertise in an area. There are shortcomings in every
too
there is a chance of personal bias in
. The combination of
can take too long to select a candidate and may be too expensive to conduct for small companies.
, the hiring approach depends upon the job and company requirements. In some situations, conducting
is more apt,
in some situations the other mechanism may be more advantageous.