Recruiting new employees can be a long and painful process. Some employers conduct
interviews
to select new workers. I disagree with the given statement, which says that the
interview
is not a reliable
method
, and other
methods
are better. I believe that
interview
is a reliable
method
, but there are many other
methods
which are equally good, and the choice is on the recruiters as to which technique they find suitable for their needs.
There are many reasons why the
interview
is preferred by some employers for hiring new staff.
Firstly
, by the ,
interview
the recruiters can get an idea about the personality and social skills of the potential employees. In
interviews
, there is face-to-face interaction and the candidates have to answer impromptu questions, from which personality mindset can be judged.
Also
, by asking some case study-type questions, employees can judge traits like the ability to handle pressure, confidence and the ability to think outside the box.
However
, there are many other selection
methods
with varied advantages. One other common
method
is a written test.
This
method
is preferred when the focus is on judging the theoretical knowledge of the person. Another conventional selection basis is group discussion.
This
method
is good where a major job requirement of the company is conversational skills
for instance
sales jobs. Group discussion can determine the convincing power of an individual.
Last
but not least, there can be a combination of all the three
methods
like written tests, followed by group discussion and
finally
interviews
.
This
method
is the most thorough of all the
methods
checking everything from personality traits to knowledge and
also
communication ability.
It is evident that different
methods
have different advantages and the best mechanism cannot be singled out. It depends upon the situation.
For example
,
interviews
assess a person’s individual ideology better
whereas
written tests are more about knowledge and expertise in an area. There are shortcomings in every
method
too
for example
there is a chance of personal bias in
interviews
. The combination of
methods
can take too long to select a candidate and may be too expensive to conduct for small companies.
To conclude
, the hiring approach depends upon the job and company requirements. In some situations, conducting
interviews
is more apt,
whereas
in some situations the other mechanism may be more advantageous.