Some people think schools should rewards students who have the best academic results, while others think it's more important to reward student who achieve other types of success (such as sports, music and good behaviour). Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

There is an ongoing debate regarding whether institution gives recompense who are good in academic scores,

while

others believe that it is essential to offer prizes to those pupils who are good in extra curriculum activities.

This

essay will examine and emanate the plausible views and inclusive with my opinion. To embark with, if a schoolchild devotes great focus on his academic skills, and gets good grades

then

price money offers to maintain the next level of performance which leads to greater opportunities in the near future.

For instance

, numerous kinds of recompenses motivate children to preserve their position and develop in social life.

Moreover

, it will arise the spirit of competition among students which leads to a better future.

On the other hand

, noncollegiate activities achievement promotes freshness in a child's mind which impacts his academic qualification

such

as inventing new ideas, learning strategies and so on.

For example

, in the Himalayan Times journal, it is clearly said that rewarding students in sports and music drastically uplifted the grades of the same students who does not perform well in previous classes. As a learner, I believe that awards for school and nonscholastic activities for adolescence are necessary for their participation and good performance. Taking everything into consideration, remunerate plays an important role in an individual's life, it does not matter if it was given by academics or any other field. It always sets a good example of appreciation.