In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sum of money on constructing new Railways land for very fast trains between cities. Others believe that money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both the views.
The question of whether to invest a substantial amount of money in constructing new
railway
lines
for very fast trains
between cities
or to allocate funds towards improving existing public transport
is a topic of debate. While
some argue for the construction of new railways, others advocate for enhancing the current public transport
systems
. Let's explore both perspectives and provide an analysis.
Proponents of constructing new railway
lines
for very fast trains
argue that it can bring several benefits
. Firstly
, high-speed trains
offer faster travel times between cities
, facilitating efficient and convenient transportation for commuters and travelers
. Change the spelling
travellers
This
can reduce congestion on roads and airports, resulting in time savings and increased productivity. Secondly
, new rail infrastructure
can stimulate economic growth and development. It can create job opportunities in construction
, manufacturing, and maintenance sectors, Correct article usage
the construction
thus
boosting the economy. Additionally
, fast and reliable rail connections can enhance connectivity between cities
, encouraging tourism and trade.
On the other hand
, advocates for improving existing public transport
systems
contend that this
approach
is a more practical and cost-effective solution. They argue that existing infrastructure
can be upgraded to meet the growing demand for transportation. By investing in the expansion and modernization of public transport
, such
as buses, trams, and metro systems
, accessibility can be improved for a larger portion of the population. This
approach
also
allows for a more flexible allocation of resources, as funds can be directed towards addressing specific needs and improving connectivity within urban areas. Moreover
, upgrading existing public transport
can lead to reduced greenhouse gas emissions and environmental benefits
, promoting sustainability.
In my opinion, a balanced approach
is necessary, considering the unique circumstances and requirements of each country or region. While
the construction of new railway
lines
for very fast trains
may be justified in densely populated areas with long distances between major cities
, it may not be the most practical solution everywhere. Investing in improving existing public transport
systems
can bring about more immediate and widespread benefits
. Enhancements like increased frequency, improved reliability, and expanded coverage can have a significant impact on the daily lives of commuters and contribute to reducing traffic congestion and environmental impact.
Ultimately, the decision should be based on comprehensive cost-benefit analyses, taking into account factors such
as population density, geographic layout, existing infrastructure
, and financial considerations. Allocating funds to improve existing public transport
should be the priority in areas where the infrastructure
is already in place and can be upgraded effectively. However
, in regions with specific needs or where very fast train connections would provide substantial benefits
, constructing new railway
lines
can be a viable option.
In conclusion, the decision between investing in new railway
lines
for very fast trains
and improving existing public transport
systems
depends on the specific context of each country or region. A balanced approach
should be taken, considering factors such
as population density, existing infrastructure
, economic viability, and environmental sustainability. By carefully evaluating the needs and potential benefits
, governments can make informed decisions to meet the transportation requirements of their citizens effectively.Submitted by ramanpreetsingh8800 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.