Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender?

There have been always differences between

men

's and

women

's work

positions

depending on their gender.

However

, nowadays, both

men

and

women

have more freedom to choose what they want to do as their career and job. Some people might say that it doesn’t need to go

further

,

although

I think that, gender equality should be spread as much as possible it can. On the one hand, there might be sufficient to remain some post dominated by

men

or

women

.

For example

, in many countries, female nurses were always more patient,

this

is the main reason why they have a larger frequency in many hospitality wards rather than males.

Although

, in some

positions

which require a great deal of physical strength like in mining,

men

are dominated. These types of

positions

mostly hiring by gender quality led to getting maximum outputs

as a result

for both individuals and employers.

However

, a wide range of job

positions

could be open with equal chances for both genders and give them equal occupation promotions. Thereby,

women

and

men

aren’t coordinated to choose based on their six, and they can follow their job dream.

This

could lead to achieving a better quality of life in societies.

For example

, female police officers may have deeper inceptions about domestic violence or adolescent crimes, or male primary teachers might be more sufficient to prepare students for facing difficulties and challenges in real life.

To conclude

, it seems that some posts are better to remain

women

or

men

dominated and

this

might be far-reaching to change.

However

, it would be considered for plenty of work

positions

to hire staff

according to

their patients and skills, not by their six identical.