Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

On the one hand, those who support the idea of asking employees for their individual information point out that a company could benefit from

this

Linking Words

gesture by getting to know their staff well. By

this

Linking Words

, we mean that to pursue an organization’s goals, it is vital to consider that some positions are exclusive to candidates with specific personality features.

For example

Linking Words

, working in a kindergarten requires a major attraction to toddlers and being a library consultant demands an excessive interest in reading numerous books in different fields.

Secondly

Linking Words

, certain job conditions would affect marital life, meaning that should applicants dedicate particular hours to work, they would encounter difficulties in having a work/life balance and spending qualified time with their spouses.

For instance

Linking Words

, jobs that require nightshifts or travelling frequently would entitle employers to get informed about the spousal relationship.

By contrast

Linking Words

, the opponents of revealing personal information cite the legal rights of conserving specific data that could be sometimes unpleasant to explain.

Moreover

Linking Words

, asking about hobbies and interests could exacerbate the lack of confidence,

for instance

Linking Words

, in those who feel unsecured about their life experiences. The second much-discussed reason for not exposing irrelevant data is related to relation boundaries between a boss and an employee, meaning that sharing personal facts appear to be regarded as misbehaviour

such

Linking Words

as a violation of privacy or unwanted intimacy.