There is a lot of pressure on young people today to succeed academically. As a result, some people believe that non-academic subjects, such as physical education and cookery, should be removed from the school syllabus so that children can concentrate on academic work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The pressure to succeed academically is a growing concern for young people. Some individuals argue that non-academic

subjects

,

such

as physical education and cookery, should be removed from the

school

syllabus

so that children can focus on academic work. In

this

essay, I will discuss both views and provide my own perspective on the issue. On the one hand, some individuals argue that non-academic

subjects

should be removed from the

school

syllabus

to allow

students

to concentrate on academic work. They argue that

this

will help

students

achieve better grades and increase their chances

Moreover

, they argue that in today's competitive job market, academic qualifications are more important than ever before, and

students

need to focus on academic

subjects

in order to succeed.

On the other hand

, there are several reasons why non-academic

subjects

should be included in the

school

syllabus

.

Firstly

, physical education is important for maintaining a healthy lifestyle and keeping

students

physically active.

Secondly

,

subjects

such

as cookery can teach important life skills and encourage healthy eating habits.

Additionally

, non-academic

subjects

can provide a break from the academic workload and help to reduce stress levels among

students

.

Finally

, non-academic

subjects

can provide opportunities for creativity and self-expression, which can be important for

overall

well-being and personal development. In conclusion,

while

academic success is important, non-academic

subjects

such

as physical education and cookery should not be removed from the

school

syllabus

. These

subjects

provide important life skills. and It can help to develop their habits