The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. • Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write
The graph illustrates the ratio of recycling materials
such
as paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans and plastic between the years 1982 to 2010.
Linking Words
Overall
, the plastic materials were the lowest recycling rate among the other waste materials. Linking Words
Whereas
, paper and cardboard were a higher rate with some fluctuations. Aluminium cans witnessed an upward trend in the given line chart.
Looking at the details, paper things Linking Words
initially
62% in 1982 and Linking Words
then
slightly increased to 1% between 1986-1990 but drastically rose to 80% in 1994 and Linking Words
then
dropped to 70% in 2010. Whilst, glass containers were 50% recycled in 1983. Linking Words
while
decreased to 40% in 1990 and from 1998 to 2010 escalated by 60% Linking Words
at the end
.
Linking Words
On the contrary
, aluminium cans stepped increase in recycling rate as it was zero per cent in 1982 but climbed dramatically to just under 50% in 2010. Linking Words
However
, plastic products accounted for the least as they did not have any data in the initial two years 1982 and 1986 respectively and Linking Words
then
it only stood at 10% in 2010.Linking Words
Submitted by seharfazal9 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Sentences: Add more complex sentences.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "increased" was used 2 times.
▼