Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies. However, Interviews form the basic criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Interviews are one of the methods used to make judgments about a

person

as that specific

person

is eligible for a specific job or not.

However

, some people argue that

this

is not a reliable recruiting method

while

others opine

this

is the best way to select employees

Although

I totally disagree with

this

statement will explain the reasons below. To embark on , as the records show the academic background of that candidate the main purpose of conducting an interview session is to judge the

person

's appearance ,way of speaking, responsive way

as well as

a particular presentation style of that individual.

Besides

, during the meet-up ,sessions it has been

also

observed, what is the nature of that

person

because individuals make the environment of the company as a whole On the flip side,depending on just

this

method sometimes neglects other things

For instance

, studies depicted that in interviews selection is first done on the base of candidate's looks and

secondly

on their cognitive abilities.

Moreover

, in some cases job nature does not involve apparent requirements only needs cognitive abilities

For example

, an employee working on computer data entry needs not

Verb problem

apply

show examples

to

Fix the infinitive

apply

show examples

be more presentable . To recapitulate,by discussing positive

as well as

negative points we

finally

got a point that interviews are not quite sufficient for selection there should be other recruiting methods involved to make a reliable selection for the company. .