Some people support the idea of imposing taxes on fossil fuels (oil, coal and gas) in order to reduce energy consumption. Others disagree with this approach. Consider the debate and its arguments, and come to your own conclusion.

Most people
agreethat
Correct your spelling
agree that
the use of fossil
fuels
should
bereduced
Correct your spelling
be reduced
to
someextent
Correct your spelling
some extent
.
However
, imposing taxes is a controversial tactic which appears to have a number of contradictory effects. We will consider both sides of the discussion in
this
essay. On the one hand, those who support taxation of fossil
fuels
promotetheidea
Correct your spelling
promote the idea
that higher prices will lead to lower consumption and
thus
loweremissions
Correct your spelling
low emissions
. They point to
evidencefrom
Correct your spelling
evidence from
countries
such
as Sweden
wherethis
Correct your spelling
where this
appears to
bethe
Correct your spelling
be the
case
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
and urge other nations to follow suit.
Furthermore
, proponents of
fuel
taxes claim that
thefunds
Correct your spelling
the funds
raised can
then
be used to
subsidiserenewableenergy
Correct your spelling
subsidise renewable energy
projects
such
as solar and localised biofuel reactors. To
thesupporters
Correct your spelling
the supporters
supporters
of
theidea
Correct your spelling
the idea
, these benefits are convincing.
However
, opponents of
fuel
tax are
ableto
Correct your spelling
able to
citeevidencefrom
Correct your spelling
cite evidence from
other countries (including France and Italy) where higher tax has apparently not reduced demand for
such
fuels
. In these cases,
theeffect
Correct your spelling
the effect
has been to force
peopleto
Correct your spelling
people to
pay
morefor
Correct your spelling
more for
thesame
Correct your spelling
the same
volume of energy, which appears to
penalisethose
Correct your spelling
penalise those
who can least afford it.
Moreover
, critics of
fuel
tax
also
highlight the difficulty in governments promising
renewableschemes
Correct your spelling
renewable schemes
without interfering in
theentireenergy
Correct your spelling
the entire energy
market. If
thestate
Correct your spelling
the state
was to control
theentire
Correct your spelling
the entire
market for
fuels
, they say,
this
would
forcesuppliers
Correct your spelling
force suppliers
force-suppliers
to
leavethe
Correct your spelling
leave the
market,
thus
reducing competition and efficiency.
This
argument
also
appears to be quite powerful.
Overall
, I would tend to side with the opponents of
fuel
taxation. It seems to be
unreasonableto
Correct your spelling
unreasonable to
unreasonable
force vulnerable consumers to pay
morefor
Correct your spelling
more for
a commodity which is essential to them, without a real infrastructure for
renewableenergy
Correct your spelling
renewable energy
being in place. It would be
morelogical
Correct your spelling
more logical
to improve
availability
Add an article
the availability
show examples
of renewables
first,
which would allow consumers to make a genuine choice.
Submitted by 786303334 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • mitigate
  • renewable energy
  • economic impact
  • regressive tax
  • alternative strategies
  • energy conservation
  • public transportation
  • green infrastructure
  • global cooperation
  • consistency
  • accountability
  • polluter pays principle
  • sustainable development
  • energy efficiency
  • fiscal policy
  • carbon footprint
  • environmental sustainability
  • energy policy
  • tax incentives
  • climate change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: