The chart below shows the results of three surveys on absenteeism in a particular European country in the years 2000, 2005 and 2010. The results show the reasons people gave for not going to work. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The provided chart illustrates the proportion of results allied to absenteeism and why people did not work in a particular European nation in three

years

including 2000,2005 and 2010.

It is clear that

while

the rates of illness which are associated with people’s unemployment account for the highest position, the

years

2000,2005 and 2010 witnessed the lowest percentage of people being out of work

due to

stress. It is noticeable that the year 2000 stood at the highest position concerned with the quantity of individuals’ redundancy because of illness. On the one hand, we can see that in family responsibility there was a similar figure with merely 20% in the

years

2005 and 2010.

In addition

, with approximately 25% the year 2000 stood at the first position in the rates of people being out of work

due to

family responsibility. Being similar to the trend of two

years

in family responsibility, the

years

2005 and 2010 had the same figure with roughly 10%.

On the contrary

, the trend of 2010 in unexpected problems was different from the year 2010 in family duty, with 10%.

On the other hand

, illness had the highest rates in the

years

2000, 2005 and 2010 with 45% , 40% and 35% that diminished by 5% each 5

years

.

Nonetheless

, stress accounted for the lowest percentages , devoting 5%, roughly 5% and more than 10% to the quantity of people’s joblessness.

Finally

, the

years

2000, 2005 and 2010 had 13%, 20% and 18% respectively in person needs.