Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other prople think that, in today’s world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In the present age, whether a branch of knowledge provides more benefits than historical material has sparked much debate. Some people assert that nowadays science and automation have been selected as essential education.
Whereas
more others argue that the past subjects are much important
. Personally, I am in favour of the first view.
Convincing arguments can be made that choosing a scientific and machinery degree has several different advantages. To start with, the fact is most of the jobs that deal with discipline education are providing salaries more than other school courses. Correct quantifier usage
more important
In other words
, the trend in our previous days is totally different from our last
generations. For example
, people are seeking the future rather than studying old topics such
as history. Therefore
, discipline and new machinery methods would certainly be fostered. Moreover
, life has changed and we should change as well, the majority have been developed and life become so difficult so dramatically, and in order to face these improvements individuals are heading to new paths related to technique subjects to face the risks of finding no jobs.
Admittedly, the past schools are no longer selected by students as before. The reason for that is
this
structure could be found so easily compared with the last
generations, every topic, subject and material has been founded on the internet and social media. Which makes nations less attractive to study it in universities.
In summary, I would concede that history has fewer benefits when it comes to knowing about our history. Despite that, technique and automation present enormous opportunities. Overall
, I am convinced that students should go to a branch of knowledge education.Submitted by khaleefalkhalaf on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
The essay demonstrates some weaknesses in terms of logical structure, introduction and conclusion, and supporting main points. The response lacks comprehensiveness and clarity, and does not provide relevant specific examples.
task achievement
The essay lacks a clear introduction and conclusion. The main points are not well supported and the response does not fully address the task. More comprehensive ideas and relevant specific examples should be provided to improve the task achievement score.