A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays,
people
always see other’s value from their grades and wealth. Their job grade is becoming the most important thing for people
to be judged. Besides
, people
’s properties such
as homes, vehicles, and gadgets can act as an asset for them to be seen as rich guys.
Technology is the most powerful aspect of people
’s personality. For instance
, using social media is mandatory for influencing someone. Individuals can perform as everything they want. Then
, a person will show off their social status such
as job grade, occupation, and material aspect. People
will try to impress the audience whatever they do. Sometimes, they will loan money from the bank to buy goods that are not necessary at all. Finally
, this
activity is not good for them because it can affect their credibility and life.
Knowing someone is to get to know deeper with them.
You can talk or even chat with them using social media. The best part of getting to know them is trying to share or discuss with them at night. Correct word choice
deeper.
Besides
, old-fashioned ways like this
will produce a chemistry between people
. If chemistry is connected to people
, it will create good communication and collaboration.
To summarize, I think the old-fashioned way is better to know someone than to judge by their social status or material possessions. People
can know each other by talking and discussing. The chemistry between people
will produce a better understanding of a person's worth. Social status and material possessions are not good to be judged.Submitted by irhamtaufiqurrahman on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
The essay demonstrates a fair level of logical structure, sufficient to convey the writer's intended meaning.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are present, but they could be more developed to better frame the argument.
coherence cohesion
The main points are supported to some extent but could be further elaborated with additional details and examples.
task achievement
The response partially addresses the task but lacks depth and development. The ideas are presented unevenly across the essay.
task achievement
The essay presents some clear and comprehensive ideas, but they are not fully developed and interconnected.
task achievement
The examples provided are somewhat relevant to the topic but could be more specific and elaborated to enhance the argument.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?