The best way to solve the traffic congestion in the city is to provide free public transport 24 hours a day, seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Traffic is an enormous urban problem in megacities, which provides solutions like free public
24/7. The vast majority of society choose to have their own car, rather than use public
, which follows a traffic jam. Personally, I believe that providing free public
is a good idea, despite
has its disadvantages.
, a
Correct your spelling
show examples
like free
can decrease the number of cars on the road,
as well as
reduce environmental pollution. That will help people to get to work on time, even in rush hour and live in a city with clean air.
For example
, the Scandinavian countries have free
in modern days and, as we can see the result is impressive. These areas have less pollution, than anywhere else in the world.
, the benefits of free communal
include increased access for low-income individuals and reduced cost of living by removing
For instance
, the example we can see nowadays is student ID, which gives a huge discount on every road.
On the other hand
, free mass transit alone might not be sufficient to solve traffic congestion. Measures,
as improving infrastructure and promoting alternative
methods could
be necessary.
, the government can find funding and maintenance challenges,
as well as
a possible decrease in quality. In conclusion, summing up all the information free public
can be a really excellent solution for the majority of cities.
, every town can not be solved only with
Submitted by katiakardash07 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure that the introduction clearly presents the topic and your position. While the introduction in this essay introduces the topic, it would benefit from a more definitive statement of your position regarding whether you agree or disagree with the prompt.
coherence cohesion
Use a range of cohesive devices appropriately to aid the flow of the essay. While some cohesive devices are used, there is room for a greater variety and more precise use to enhance the logical flow of ideas.
coherence cohesion
Each paragraph should develop a single main idea with clear supporting details. Some paragraphs in this essay could be more focused with stronger support for the claims made.
task achievement
Address all parts of the task by giving a balanced view and developing arguments for and against the proposition, concluding with a clear opinion. The essay addresses the prompt, but the development of ideas and the provision of examples could be more thorough.
task achievement
Present ideas clearly and expand upon them comprehensively by explaining how they relate to the topic. While ideas are presented, they could be expanded upon more fully to demonstrate a complete understanding of the topic.
task achievement
Include specific and relevant examples to support your arguments. While there are attempts to provide examples, aim for more accuracy and development to clearly illustrate your points.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • urban planning
  • mass transit systems
  • traffic flow
  • rush hour
  • vehicle emissions
  • sustainable transportation
  • infrastructure development
  • commuter habits
  • overcrowding issues
  • public funding
  • quality of service
  • economic feasibility
  • environmental impact
  • modal shift
  • accessibility
What to do next:
Look at other essays: