Some people think all university student should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

A group of individuals present the view that university
students
should pursue their interests by studying what they prefer,
whereas
others maintain that they should be forced to study majors that can offer benefits in the future. I strongly agree with the former arguments, and the reasons will be outlined. On the one hand, some people justifiably argue that if
students
follow what they are interested in at college, they are more likely to become accomplished. In
this
regard, research findings confirm that the efficiency of
students
who find their field of study satisfactory is nearly twice as much as that of those who are compelled to pursue a major in higher education.
Furthermore
, by studying a fond subject,
students
face fewer challenges to stay motivated;
thus
, if they face difficulties, they are very likely to overcome them and obtain strong credentials.
For instance
, a friend of mine who is fond of materials science studies more than ten hours a day and never gives up when some unappealing results are obtained.
On the other hand
, another group claims that the government should enforce strict laws so as to ban studying in certain research areas. They insist that dedicating funds
as well as
spending time on some fields,
such
as history, is a complete waste of resources and time because they fail to improve the next generations' standards of living.
However
, I do not find
this
argument convincing, as it is believed that history,
for example
, is full of valuable life lessons that have been passed down from our ancestors;
therefore
, we should take full advantage of it by encouraging
students
to gain in-depth knowledge in
this
field at universities, which can broaden researchers' horizons to explore unknown domains in the future.
To conclude
, in my view,
students
should not be restricted to study only certain fields. Studying beloved subjects not only can boost their performance but
also
may open the doors to novel discoveries.
Submitted by m.r.zamani1376678 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure that the logical structure of your essay follows a clear and consistent pattern. While the essay is well-structured overall, there are opportunities for improved connectivity and flow between ideas.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are present and effectively frame the essay's argument, which is commendable. Ensure the conclusion echoes the strength and clarity of the introduction.
coherence cohesion
The main points are supported, and the argument is developed. Aim for even deeper analysis and richer examples to support each point for an even stronger essay.
task achievement
Your response to the task is complete, and you provide a clear and comprehensive answer to the question, demonstrating a competent understanding of the views presented.
task achievement
You present ideas very clearly and comprehensively, which is excellent. Maintain this clarity throughout every paragraph to consistently communicate your discussion points.
task achievement
You provided relevant examples to support your points. To elevate your essay, focus on incorporating specific, detailed examples that directly reinforce your argument.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Motivation
  • Well-rounded education
  • Critical thinking
  • Job markets
  • Economic demand
  • Skilled workers
  • Practical application
  • Innovation
  • Societal progress
  • Passion
  • Pragmatism
  • Future job prospects
What to do next:
Look at other essays: